Film possesses a special look in the right lighting conditions. We're huge fans of shooting film and shoot it regularly. In fact, you can read more about that in our article about why we think brides and grooms should consider. ![]() May 20, 2017 A detailed review of the Contax 645 medium format film camera. The overview including pros, cons, and a detailed look at how to use the Contax 645. I've been using the Contax. The Contax 645, a robust system familiar with many for its unique look, beautiful lenses and it’s mechanical reliability. Primed for digital, the Contax 645 is the perfect hybrid solution for photographers shooting 120 film but needing the flexibility of digital to help expand what they offer. Kirby 64 the crystal shards. However, we are very open to embracing other options besides film for a couple reasons: * Wanting to have digital backups that match our film as close as possible * Cost of film, developing, scanning, etc With that said, we think that there's very few options that give us the depth, feel, and overlook of our medium format film cameras. But those that do are slowly convincing us that we’d be happy shooting without film in most if not all cases. Why Use Digital Alternatives to Medium Format Film? Maybe you're looking for a setup to match your medium format setup. Or maybe you're wanting to get the look of the 80mm f/2 on Contax 645, but without spending thousands upon thousands on film costs per year. If you shoot a lot of film, switching to digital could save tons in time. We calculated that, when shooting only 10 rolls per wedding at 30 weddings a year, we'd save about $7,500+ per year on film, developing/scanning, shipping, etc. By switching to digital. And if that's you, you might be encouraged knowing, that you're investing in valuable goods--you can sell your gear at some point and still recover cost. With film, you shoot it and there's no object that you can sell/use to recover your initial investment. Zeiss ikon contina iii. I have gotten another Zeiss camera, but this one is not showing up on the zeiss info sheets I have looked at? Body says Zeiss Ikon Contina,on the back leather side it says 529/24 and serial# J 70183 made in Stuttgart Germany, now the lens Pantar 45mm F2.8 serial;# 3327605 and the front element is removable and the shutter is a Prontor svs? The problem is, we love the look and overall experience of shooting film! And digital can sometimes, if not often, fall very short. Sensor Size Matters 'The look' of the medium format perspective is unique and interesting, and there are but a few digital options which proivde that 'look' or something pretty close to it. BUT, keep in mind that film 645s shoot a negative that is 56 x 42mm. Many digital backs or 'digital medium format' 645s are a different crop than film 645s. The largest sensor size at the time of this writing for digital 645 is 53.9 x 40.4mm for a 'CCD' sensor and 53.4 x 40.1mm for a 'CMOS' sensor. Though slightly smaller than 'true' 645, these are very close to their film counterparts. Or, if you're not ready to spend a huge chunk of cash, there are some pretty convincing full-frame/a little bigger than full-frame options that offer very compelling results when paired with the right lens. We are absolutely in love with this combo. From the bokeh to the overall classic rendering, this lens + camera combo doesn’t disappoint. You can purchase your from. Pros: • Classic rendering with lots of character • Ver, very nice bokeh • Beautiful color rendition • f/2 aperture is the same as a f/1.58 lens on a full-frame/35mm camera Cons: • Fixed aperture at f/2 (some at f/1.7, or some a little smaller at f/2.1, 2.3) • Will need to be custom made/modded to fit, either by your own mod, or by -with the Voigtlander 58mm f/1.4 (Nikon Mount). This is probably one our favorites for rendering a classic look similiar to the Zeiss 80mm f/2. Fsx scenery library. If you’re going to mount the 58mm 1.4 on your GFX you’ll need an adapter such as the. When mounted on the GFX, this lens ends up up being about a 45mm f/1.1 in terms of 35mm equivalent. Personally, we find this perspective to be a bit wide for our taste when it comes to many facial features and body types in terms of portraits. Pros: • Classic rendering very similar to Contax 80mm of Contax 645 Cons: • A little wide for some facial/body types in terms of portraits (personal opinion) • Bokeh can be a bit busy to some -with the Mitakon 65mm f/1.4. The Mitakon 65mm is another great options for your GFX. It doesn’t have quite as classic of a rendering as some of the other options, but it is a true 50mm (about 51.35mm, technically), so it has that as a positive. Some have described the bokeh as being a bit more sterile/not quite as pronounced as the Zeiss 80mm f/2 on Contax 645. Pros: • 50mm perspective (full-frame/35mm equivalent) making it a great all-around lens • f/1.4 for all your shallow depth of field and low-light needs Cons: • Many people have reported issues with quality control. This will hopefully improve as time goes on. • Bokeh is very smooth and uninteresting to some • Some do not like the clickless aperture.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |